View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DrunkenMaster
Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 100
Location: usa
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 8:09 am Post subject: My upcoming quake movie quality test |
|
|
well here is a quality test for my upcoming movie, that is currently under way im not sure if its good enough or not?
i was hoping you guys would tell me if the quality of this sample/test is up to par with other quake videos, along with the audio, i through in a song in the BG @ 160kbps compression
the divx codec i used is DivX 5.1.1 Pro, (4 pass)
www.divx.com - Beware of ad-aware!
i dont have any type of hosting, so the file is split into Sixteen-1.8mb rar files on some freebie server.
you will need winrar or winace to extract this movie
www.winrar.com
End size = 29.2Mb
Lenght = 1:17
http://drunkenmaster.250free.com/linuximages/
_________________
Quake - the final frontier
PSU: 350W MAX
CPU: AthlonXP 1700+ @ 2.17GHz (O/Ced)!!
MoBo: EPoX 8K9A2
Ram: pc2700 Kingston 512MB, Timings: 2.0-3-2-6CL
HDD: IBM 60GB ATA/133
Video: ATi Radeon 9600XT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stoo
Joined: 11 Dec 2003
Posts: 23
Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the quality looks absolutely fine to me, man.. i'd leave it like that |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Drugs-Bunny
Joined: 26 Feb 2003
Posts: 94
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The quality looks fine. However, you should try sync the audio with the frags.
Btw, how does the Xvid codec do compared to Divx ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mick
Joined: 05 Apr 2003
Posts: 151
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2003 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FUC**** Nice quali !!! but use r_viewmodelsize 0.5 or 0.6 and viewsize 111
_________________
mick.starthotel.dk
#zfl #quakeworld #fuhquake #serv-u |
|
Back to top |
|
|
t00nsy
Joined: 02 Feb 2003
Posts: 109
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
are those files meant to be merged ? i don't have winrar as i'm using linux but i'd like to see ur work...
any chance for the vid to be mirrored somewhere ?
_________________
"Software is like sex...it's better when it's free" Linus Torvald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
manny
Joined: 16 Dec 2002
Posts: 108
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
t00nsy: no need for winrar, still got rh or Fc1?
apt-get install unrar
unrar e <filename>
or there must be a .deb or .rpm for your disto somewhere
duhno about the files merging.
btw that mirror seems to be racist |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrunkenMaster
Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 100
Location: usa
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
i dont got the test mirrored some where else
i didnt put any work into choreographing the test, a friend of mine was making a video as well, and i used this test to wage war against em, and in his test he had no audio at all, so i fugred id 1 up him and put audio in mine
_________________
Quake - the final frontier
PSU: 350W MAX
CPU: AthlonXP 1700+ @ 2.17GHz (O/Ced)!!
MoBo: EPoX 8K9A2
Ram: pc2700 Kingston 512MB, Timings: 2.0-3-2-6CL
HDD: IBM 60GB ATA/133
Video: ATi Radeon 9600XT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Goljat
Joined: 09 Nov 2002
Posts: 174
Location: Helsinki,Finland
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
use xvid instead of divx, when i made my own nqr video at least i got better quality in xvid version with lower bitrate than divx.
_________________
www.Slackers.dk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrunkenMaster
Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 100
Location: usa
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Goljat wrote: |
use xvid instead of divx, when i made my own nqr video at least i got better quality in xvid version with lower bitrate than divx. |
that may of been true with older versions of divx, but i have no knowlege on how to do more then 1 pass with xvid as i do with divx
what is more widely used? xvid or divx?
divx.
_________________
Quake - the final frontier
PSU: 350W MAX
CPU: AthlonXP 1700+ @ 2.17GHz (O/Ced)!!
MoBo: EPoX 8K9A2
Ram: pc2700 Kingston 512MB, Timings: 2.0-3-2-6CL
HDD: IBM 60GB ATA/133
Video: ATi Radeon 9600XT
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MIXU
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Posts: 35
Location: Ireland
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
natas
Joined: 28 Nov 2003
Posts: 21
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2003 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This site has reached its bandwidth limit.
Please try again later.
all the time... =( |
|
Back to top |
|
|
j0zz1e
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
the best combo is XVID encoder using DIVX codec imho
seriously. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DrunkenMaster
Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 100
Location: usa
|
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2003 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
j0zz1e wrote: |
the best combo is XVID encoder using DIVX codec imho
seriously. |
where can i d/l xvid encoder?
_________________
Quake - the final frontier
PSU: 350W MAX
CPU: AthlonXP 1700+ @ 2.17GHz (O/Ced)!!
MoBo: EPoX 8K9A2
Ram: pc2700 Kingston 512MB, Timings: 2.0-3-2-6CL
HDD: IBM 60GB ATA/133
Video: ATi Radeon 9600XT
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
j0zz1e
Joined: 22 Oct 2003
Posts: 19
Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Sun Dec 28, 2003 5:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.roeder.goe.net/~koepi/xvid.shtml
The Xvid encoder lets you to change the capturing codec (for me it provided both XVID and DIVX), I used DIVX and I believe it's better than its own XVID codec.
Sorry for the late replying, I totally forgot about this thread :/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|